Counter Proliferation financing is key for accountants to understand as part of their AML/CFT measures to help reduce money-laundering globally.
Explained: Counter Proliferation financing (CPF) by Firmcheck
When it comes to combating global threats, financial systems play a critical role beyond traditional crime. One such threat that demands attention is the financing of proliferation activities, which poses significant risks to international security. Counter Proliferation Financing (CPF) is a vital component of the global effort to combat the financing of weapons of mass destruction (WMD) proliferation. In this article, we will delve into the concept of CPF, its significance, the measures taken to address this pressing issue, and how accountants can play a role in preventing money being used for the financing of WMD.
Before we dive into the nitty gritty, let’s cover the basics.
Counter Proliferation Financing (CPF) refers to the financial measures taken to disrupt and prevent the funding of activities associated with the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction (WMDs).
WMD proliferation poses severe threats to global peace and stability, making it essential to cut off the financial channels that facilitate such activities. CPF complements the broader strategy of non-proliferation efforts by targeting the financial networks used by proliferators to acquire, produce, or trade WMDs and related materials.
CPF plays a crucial role in national and international security. By targeting the financial lifelines of proliferators, CPF seeks to impede their ability to develop, manufacture, or acquire WMDs.
Disrupting the financial networks and transactions that sustain these activities hinders the movement of money across borders, making it challenging for proliferators to fund their illicit operations.
Additionally, CPF contributes to strengthening the global non-proliferation framework and enhancing international cooperation. Countries around the world collaborate in sharing financial intelligence, implementing targeted financial sanctions, and building capacity to detect and prevent proliferation financing. This cooperation creates a collective and united front against the common threat of WMD proliferation.
To effectively combat CPF, countries adopt a multi-faceted approach involving several key measures:
Governments impose targeted sanctions on individuals, entities, and networks involved in proliferation activities. These sanctions freeze assets, restrict financial transactions, and create obstacles to the movement of funds.
Almost all countries have sanctions lists that outline certain businesses, individuals, and groups that are deemed a risk.
We’ll all remember the most recent global example, when Russia decided to invade Ukraine, alongside a laundry list of other sanctions, from a monetary perspective there were also sanctions placed to reduce the potential financing of weapons, and Russian military initiatives.
Countries integrate CPF measures into their Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and Countering the Financing of Terrorism (CFT) frameworks. This ensures that financial institutions and designated non-financial businesses are equipped to identify and report suspicious activities linked to proliferation financing.
Governments collaborate with the private sector, including financial institutions, to enhance detection capabilities and share information on emerging proliferation financing risks.
Support is provided to countries that require assistance in building their capacity to combat CPF effectively. This includes training personnel, establishing financial intelligence units, and implementing effective legal and regulatory frameworks.
CPF requires international cooperation and coordination. Countries work together through regional and global forums to strengthen collective efforts against proliferation financing. This information-sharing enhances the collective understanding of the tactics and strategies used by proliferators. Organisations like the Egmont Group help facilitate the sharing of information across member Financial Intelligence Units (FIUs) by providing a secure platform for information sharing to counter money laundering, terrorist financing, and other illegal activities.
Despite all the methods adopted at an international level, those working in the accountancy industry also need to take precautions to prevent money from being used for the funding of WMD.
The actual ‘steps’ you need to take aren’t any different to what you’ll be doing as part of your AML compliance process to spot things like money laundering – but the ways in which individuals or businesses might use the monetary system to fund these sorts of activities do come with slightly different ‘red flags’.
As accountants, we’re always on the lookout for suspicious transactions, and in the case of financing WMD, it’s important to keep an eye out for frequent cash transactions from clients in sectors susceptible to proliferation financing, such as trading in dual-use goods or technology. Unlike money-laundering where you are keeping an eye out for larger transactions, these transactions typically involve smaller amounts. Building some triggers, or red flags, into your AML monitoring program will help ensure funds aren’t being used illegally by your clients, and when anything unusual does pop up you’re ready to take the necessary steps to report any suspicious transactions.
Remember it’s your obligation under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 to submit suspicious activity reports (SARs) should you believe something looks suspicious or unordinary.
If you’re dealing with international clients or cross-border transactions, you’ll already have a heightened level of diligence (enhanced due diligence), and you should be paying close attention to any irregular patterns or complex financial structures that may indicate attempts to obscure the origins of funds linked to proliferation activities.
A recent example of this playing out in reality is from December 2020, when the the US Treasury sanctioned a number of UK-based entities that had been used to own vessels trading North Korean coal, in violation of United Nations Security Council (UNSC) resolutions. In some of the cases, shell companies had been set up and used in the UK by one of China’s largest North Korean cross-border traders. He had acted on behalf of sanctioned North Korean proliferators and helped them procure items for their weapons programme while laundering tens of millions of dollars on their behalf.
This one might feel obvious as you’ll no doubt be doing this anyway as part of your AML program, but carrying out CDD on clients beyond simply verifying IDs can go a long way to highlight any potential risks. Getting to know your customer, their relationships, or what entities they might be involved in will help build a complete picture. You might discover during the due diligence process that they are engaged with individuals or entities that come with a heightened risk of WMD proliferation.
For example, if you find out they have interests in a company located in a country on an international or national sanctions list, in a country which has historic associations with producing WMD that should trigger alarm bells that require an enhanced level of due diligence.
As mentioned above, enhanced due diligence (EDD) measures are integral when anything out of the ordinary pops up. It’s important to make sure you have these triggers or red flags built into your AML program to strengthen your CPF efforts. Anyone working with PEPs should implement enhanced due diligence measures to mitigate the risk of funds being channelled towards proliferation financing through politically connected networks – as PEPs are typically at a heightened risk of being exposed to bribery or corruption due to their status.
Counter Proliferation Financing (CPF) is a crucial component of the global effort to combat the financing of weapons of mass destruction (WMD) proliferation. Through their AML programs accounting firms can be an integral part of disrupting the financial systems that help the development of WMD.
Beyond that, the whole financial systems (including banks and other financial institutions) of every country can work towards global security through financial intelligence sharing, targeted sanctions, and capacity building. CPF serves as a testament to the significance of financial measures in addressing complex global threats and underscores the critical role of the financial sector in safeguarding international security.
If you'd like to learn more about CPF, and other key components related to money laundering, we've created a free, online course just for accountants – give it a try and improve your AML knowledge or you can always ask our AI Chatbot AMLia a question, and there's a good chance they'll be able to answer it.
(NB: This article doesn't constitute legal advice and is intended for general informational purposes only. Always consult with a legal expert or compliance consultant for guidance specific to your firm.)
Latest news, events, and updates on all things app related, plus useful advice on app advisory - so you know you are ahead of the game.